If you've been keeping tabs, it seems the katrina "victims" (or as I like to call them, people who didn't get out of the way even though they had a few days advance warning) have been squandering the FEMA money that WE were forced to pay for. There are accounts of the "victims" spending the emergency money on strippers, traffic tickets, and other such "vital" needs. You have a whole town full of welfare people, who blame everyone else for their lives, and think they are entitled to other peoples' money, and when they are given even more money they blow it, and some people are surprised.
It's politically incorrect to say that people are poor because of their own choices, but it's true. Sure people can fall on hard times and be broke, but it's what you do with it afterwards that makes the difference between the poor and everyone else. I've been broke, and I stopped spending money on things I didn't need, and tried to save money when I could. And when it got asked for help from family, which I paid back when I got on my feet again. The poor are just those who give up and then expect everyone else to take care of them.
The welfare people believe they are entitled to everyone else's money. This is in part because they were programmed to believe this by our politicians. In fact, all government handouts are called entitlements. It's the politicians way of making their consitiuents believe they are owed the money from the evil oppressors (ie. people that work and take care of themselves). Every election you hear both ends of the ruling political party (yes I said one party, not two. Dem's and Rep's are just ends of the same party), accuse the other one of taking money away from the "deserving" poor. If you ever listen to what they are really saying, and reword into everyday language, they are realy saying, "You all are too stupid to take care of yourselves. Trust in me to take the smart people's money away form them and use it to take care of you, like my own babies."
So what do we have to show for this election strategy? A society where a majority of its citizens believe that earning your own money is bad, and that it's the federal government's role to take care of every need of every person.
200 years goes by so fast, doesn't it? Read my earlier posts if you don't know what I'm referring to. It's time to start the whole damn thing over again. Check out the Freestate Project if you want a possible exit strategy.
Monday, February 13, 2006
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
The media pussies and the "peace loving" muslims
I keep hearing about how islam is a religion of peace, and that there's just a few bad apples out there. Have you seen the riots lately over a cartoon? Ya, we should be able to coexist with them just fine *rolls eyes*. And the kicker is how the media is bowing to these psychotic demonstrators. CNN is not posting any pictures of the cartoons "out of respect for Islam" in this article here. And yet whenever any christians get mad over art that defames christianity, the media just goes gaga to show it as much as they can. Check out this article from '99 when a picture of the virgin mary covered in elephant dung angered some people. They showed the picture in the article. Yet we can't offend the muslims. What the hell? They're seems to be a big bias against the middle kid of "The Book."
Don't get me wrong, I don't like any of the religions. They're all full of crap, and mainly used as tools to control people. But I'm fair about it. Why treat the latest barbaric religion as special, and not ofend them but to hell with the others? Republicans would most likely say it's because the "big media" is anti-christian and will do anything to bring it down. But if that were true, why would they be sponsoring an even more dogmatic and controlling religion (Islam) that would kill those very same reporters because they ate pork once. It doesn't make sense to me to trade a measurably opressive religion that has grown out of it's "kill 'em all" phase (The crusades, dark ages, etc) and will now at least let you live if you disagree with it, for one that is now throwing a global temper tantrum and will kill all people who don't strictly conform with their beliefs.
I think it may come down to something simpler, more basic. I think the media is scared shitless of the muslims because they know they're a bunch of blood lusting control freaks. But they can't say that because it would be politically incorrect, and because admitting that that part of the world might have a few screws loose just might make President Bush seem a little more sensible. I'm not a big fan of Bush either, but I like it when he kills the people that want to kill me. I'm all for that. But the anti-bush crowd has to make it seem like Bush is the psycho one, not the wonderful muslims. So they have to somehow make the global riots over a fucking cartoon seem not so bad.
I can't wait to get in there and mix it up. What fun.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like any of the religions. They're all full of crap, and mainly used as tools to control people. But I'm fair about it. Why treat the latest barbaric religion as special, and not ofend them but to hell with the others? Republicans would most likely say it's because the "big media" is anti-christian and will do anything to bring it down. But if that were true, why would they be sponsoring an even more dogmatic and controlling religion (Islam) that would kill those very same reporters because they ate pork once. It doesn't make sense to me to trade a measurably opressive religion that has grown out of it's "kill 'em all" phase (The crusades, dark ages, etc) and will now at least let you live if you disagree with it, for one that is now throwing a global temper tantrum and will kill all people who don't strictly conform with their beliefs.
I think it may come down to something simpler, more basic. I think the media is scared shitless of the muslims because they know they're a bunch of blood lusting control freaks. But they can't say that because it would be politically incorrect, and because admitting that that part of the world might have a few screws loose just might make President Bush seem a little more sensible. I'm not a big fan of Bush either, but I like it when he kills the people that want to kill me. I'm all for that. But the anti-bush crowd has to make it seem like Bush is the psycho one, not the wonderful muslims. So they have to somehow make the global riots over a fucking cartoon seem not so bad.
I can't wait to get in there and mix it up. What fun.
Friday, February 03, 2006
The march to totalitarianism continues
Read the article at that link. Now the government can make secret laws, charge you with violating it, and then not have to show you the law, because it's a secret. Stalin would be proud.
Remember, the average lifespan of any free republic is 200 years. After that they breakdown into dictatorships. We're over 200 years. The dictatorship is growing every day. Get ready people.
Remember, the average lifespan of any free republic is 200 years. After that they breakdown into dictatorships. We're over 200 years. The dictatorship is growing every day. Get ready people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)